In his book, Damiano Canale assumes that the vocabulary of the philosophy of law best fits an explanation of the nature of law, to deal particularly with the issue of conflict. From conceptual analysis to the philosophy of action, law is a planning activity that coordinates our behavior in order to resolve doubts and disagreements about the moral matters that affect our communal life. The text thereby provides a new perspective for legal philosophy, a perspective that is alternative to both naturalized jurisprudence and the Oxford-style approach to the study of legal concepts. In my comment, I try to assess how convincing is Canale’s proposal of providing reasons for settling conflicts, with a special focus to the similarities between philosophy of law and political philosophy. Both these branches of philosophy are likely to have the explanatory resources for underpinning our common sense assumptions about law and morality.

Ragioni per agire : il diritto come processo di interpretazione e come pratica sociale / B. Magni. - In: NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA. - ISSN 1128-2401. - 35:134(2019), pp. 172-175.

Ragioni per agire : il diritto come processo di interpretazione e come pratica sociale

B. Magni
2019

Abstract

In his book, Damiano Canale assumes that the vocabulary of the philosophy of law best fits an explanation of the nature of law, to deal particularly with the issue of conflict. From conceptual analysis to the philosophy of action, law is a planning activity that coordinates our behavior in order to resolve doubts and disagreements about the moral matters that affect our communal life. The text thereby provides a new perspective for legal philosophy, a perspective that is alternative to both naturalized jurisprudence and the Oxford-style approach to the study of legal concepts. In my comment, I try to assess how convincing is Canale’s proposal of providing reasons for settling conflicts, with a special focus to the similarities between philosophy of law and political philosophy. Both these branches of philosophy are likely to have the explanatory resources for underpinning our common sense assumptions about law and morality.
Morality; Normativity; Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Disagreement; Conflict
Settore SPS/01 - Filosofia Politica
2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Politeia_134_Beatrice_Magni.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 205.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
205.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/665890
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact