No formal investigations have been conducted into the efficacy or potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decisions, and the impact of this on the expectations and behaviour of authors, reviewers and journal editors. This article addresses key questions about this critical aspect of the peer review submission process. We suggest several future steps which could be taken towards improving the review process and make it more transparent, better understood, and fairer for all parties
Boon, bias or bane? The potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decision-making / J. P Tennant, B. Penders, T. Ross-Hellauer, A. Marušić, F. Squazzoni, A.W. Mackay, C.R. Madan, D.M. Shaw, S. Alam, B. Mehmani, D. Graziotin, D. Nicholas. - In: EUROPEAN SCIENCE EDITING. - ISSN 0258-3127. - 45:1(2019 Feb), pp. 2-5. [10.20316/ESE.2019.45.18013]
Boon, bias or bane? The potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decision-making
F. SquazzoniWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;
2019
Abstract
No formal investigations have been conducted into the efficacy or potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decisions, and the impact of this on the expectations and behaviour of authors, reviewers and journal editors. This article addresses key questions about this critical aspect of the peer review submission process. We suggest several future steps which could be taken towards improving the review process and make it more transparent, better understood, and fairer for all parties
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE2019EditorialTennantEtAl.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.09 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.09 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
