The advent of the Internet of things (IoT) has radically changed the way in which computations and communications are carried out. People are just becoming another component of IoT environments, and in turn, IoT environments are becoming a mixture of platforms, software, services, things, and people. The price we pay for such dynamic and powerful environment is an intrinsic uncertainty and low trustworthiness due to its opaque perimeter, the multitude of different data sources with unknown providers, and uncertain responsibilities. Trustworthiness of observables collected by smart devices (from minuscle sensors to bigger machines) is fundamental to build a chain of trust on a decision process taken according to these observables. Some assurance solutions evaluate the quality of collected data, although they are difficult to apply in IoT environments for performance and cost reasons. In this paper, we take a different approach and put forward the idea that, in many cases, the behavior of people owning smart devices can contribute to the evaluation of the trustworthiness of collected data and, in turn, of the whole decision process. We therefore define an assurance methodology based on data analytics evaluating the compliance of people to behavioral policies. The more people behavior is compliant, the higher the trustworthiness of data collected through their smart devices.

A trust assurance technique for Internet of things based on human behavior compliance / M. Anisetti, C.A. Ardagna, E. Damiani, A. Sala. - In: CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION. - ISSN 1532-0626. - 33:4(2021 Feb).

A trust assurance technique for Internet of things based on human behavior compliance

M. Anisetti
;
C.A. Ardagna;E. Damiani;
2021

Abstract

The advent of the Internet of things (IoT) has radically changed the way in which computations and communications are carried out. People are just becoming another component of IoT environments, and in turn, IoT environments are becoming a mixture of platforms, software, services, things, and people. The price we pay for such dynamic and powerful environment is an intrinsic uncertainty and low trustworthiness due to its opaque perimeter, the multitude of different data sources with unknown providers, and uncertain responsibilities. Trustworthiness of observables collected by smart devices (from minuscle sensors to bigger machines) is fundamental to build a chain of trust on a decision process taken according to these observables. Some assurance solutions evaluate the quality of collected data, although they are difficult to apply in IoT environments for performance and cost reasons. In this paper, we take a different approach and put forward the idea that, in many cases, the behavior of people owning smart devices can contribute to the evaluation of the trustworthiness of collected data and, in turn, of the whole decision process. We therefore define an assurance methodology based on data analytics evaluating the compliance of people to behavioral policies. The more people behavior is compliant, the higher the trustworthiness of data collected through their smart devices.
assurance; behavioral analysis; bigdata; internet of things
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
   Cyber security cOmpeteNce fOr Research anD Innovation (CONCORDIA)
   CONCORDIA
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   H2020
   830927
feb-2021
17-giu-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 621.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
621.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Anisetti_et_al-2019-Concurrency_and_Computation__Practice_and_Experience.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.09 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.09 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/652526
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact