This chapter focuses on the Five Star Movement (FSM) and its relations with social movements. First, the connections with movements in the emerging phase of the party is discussed showing that, albeit in a fuzzy, contradictory and inconsistent way, the party captured activists, grievances, claims and action forms from social movements of the past decade. Second, with reference to the legislature 2013-2018 the development of a peculiar parliamentary style is illustrated, showing how the FSM elected representatives disrupted the normal institutional routine by staging protest actions within the parliament, shifting their focus from real conflicts and movements to the media. Third, the participatory opportunities provided by the party are critically assessed analysing the actual working of its platform “Rousseau”, intended to facilitate members’ online participation. Finally, a discussion on the current nature of the FSM questions to what an extent it can still be considered a movement party proximate to the field of contentious politics after 5 years in parliament and in light of becoming the most voted party in the 2018 general elections and subsequently forming part of a coalition government.

The Five Star Movement’s progressive detachment from social movements / L. Mosca - In: Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements : Protest in Turbulent Times / [a cura di] C. Flesher Fominaya, R. Feenstra. - Prima edizione. - [s.l] : Routledge, 2020. - ISBN 9781138494930. - pp. 357-371

The Five Star Movement’s progressive detachment from social movements

L. Mosca
2020

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the Five Star Movement (FSM) and its relations with social movements. First, the connections with movements in the emerging phase of the party is discussed showing that, albeit in a fuzzy, contradictory and inconsistent way, the party captured activists, grievances, claims and action forms from social movements of the past decade. Second, with reference to the legislature 2013-2018 the development of a peculiar parliamentary style is illustrated, showing how the FSM elected representatives disrupted the normal institutional routine by staging protest actions within the parliament, shifting their focus from real conflicts and movements to the media. Third, the participatory opportunities provided by the party are critically assessed analysing the actual working of its platform “Rousseau”, intended to facilitate members’ online participation. Finally, a discussion on the current nature of the FSM questions to what an extent it can still be considered a movement party proximate to the field of contentious politics after 5 years in parliament and in light of becoming the most voted party in the 2018 general elections and subsequently forming part of a coalition government.
Five Star Movement; movement party; social movement proximity; Rousseau platform
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
Settore SPS/11 - Sociologia dei Fenomeni Politici
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
2020
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mosca 2020 - Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 334.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
334.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/652387
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact