The paper addresses a topic still largely under-researched in comparative welfare state literature: the role of right parties in the reform of last resort safety nets. More precisely, the study investigates minimum income schemes’ reforms promoted during the Great Recession (2008–2013) by centre-right governments in three countries belonging to the European periphery: Italy, Portugal and Latvia. Despite common political orientation and increased problem pressure, these countries have gone through distinct reform trajectories in their social safety nets that may be labelled expansion (Latvia), retrenchment (Portugal), and continuity (Italy). Against this backdrop, the paper suggests that right parties display substantially different positions and pursue different reform strategies in anti-poverty policies. These differences can be explained by the diverse types of right parties and varying competition and coalition dynamics in the three countries.

The right(s) and minimum income in hard times : Southern and Eastern Europe compared / M. Natili, M. Jessoula, I. Madama, M. Matsaganis. - In: EUROPEAN SOCIETIES. - ISSN 1461-6696. - (2018 Jul 11). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1080/14616696.2018.1494300]

The right(s) and minimum income in hard times : Southern and Eastern Europe compared

M. Natili
;
M. Jessoula;I. Madama;
2018

Abstract

The paper addresses a topic still largely under-researched in comparative welfare state literature: the role of right parties in the reform of last resort safety nets. More precisely, the study investigates minimum income schemes’ reforms promoted during the Great Recession (2008–2013) by centre-right governments in three countries belonging to the European periphery: Italy, Portugal and Latvia. Despite common political orientation and increased problem pressure, these countries have gone through distinct reform trajectories in their social safety nets that may be labelled expansion (Latvia), retrenchment (Portugal), and continuity (Italy). Against this backdrop, the paper suggests that right parties display substantially different positions and pursue different reform strategies in anti-poverty policies. These differences can be explained by the diverse types of right parties and varying competition and coalition dynamics in the three countries.
right parties; political competition; social policy; political cleavages; poverty
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
11-lug-2018
11-lug-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
NatiliJessoulaMadamaMatsaganis_2018Post_referaggio.pdf

Open Access dal 10/07/2020

Descrizione: versione accettata
Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 960.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
960.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/587161
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact