PURPOSE: A long debate exists about the connection between anorexia nervosa (AN) and scoliosis due to conflicting evidence. No study so far has evaluated the prevalence of scoliosis in patients with AN. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in patients with AN. METHODS: Design: cross-sectional study. STUDY GROUP: convenience sample of all patients matching the inclusion criteria. CONTROL GROUP: female participants coming from an epidemiological screening for scoliosis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients had a diagnosis of AN during adolescence according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria. We applied a two-level screening using a Bunnell scoliometer and a radiograph. We calculated the odds ratio compared with participants coming from a school screening. RESULTS: Seventy-seven females with AN were compared to 816 females screened for scoliosis. The prevalence of scoliosis in the AN group was 16.9% (OR 5.77, 95% CI 3.12-10.67) with respect to the control group. If we consider as positive only those who received a scoliosis diagnosis during adolescence, the OR would be 3.15 (95% CI 1.55-6.42). DISCUSSION: This is the first study performed on patients with AN showing a sixfold greater odds of presenting with scoliosis. A cause-effect relationship cannot be determined due to the design.

Prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in anorexia nervosa patients: results from a cross-sectional study / F. Zaina, F. Pesenti, L. Persani, P. Capodaglio, S. Negrini, N. Polli. - In: EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL. - ISSN 0940-6719. - 27:2(2018), pp. 293-297. [10.1007/s00586-017-5181-9]

Prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in anorexia nervosa patients: results from a cross-sectional study

L. Persani
Writing – Review & Editing
;
S. Negrini
Writing – Review & Editing
;
N. Polli
Supervision
2018

Abstract

PURPOSE: A long debate exists about the connection between anorexia nervosa (AN) and scoliosis due to conflicting evidence. No study so far has evaluated the prevalence of scoliosis in patients with AN. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in patients with AN. METHODS: Design: cross-sectional study. STUDY GROUP: convenience sample of all patients matching the inclusion criteria. CONTROL GROUP: female participants coming from an epidemiological screening for scoliosis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients had a diagnosis of AN during adolescence according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria. We applied a two-level screening using a Bunnell scoliometer and a radiograph. We calculated the odds ratio compared with participants coming from a school screening. RESULTS: Seventy-seven females with AN were compared to 816 females screened for scoliosis. The prevalence of scoliosis in the AN group was 16.9% (OR 5.77, 95% CI 3.12-10.67) with respect to the control group. If we consider as positive only those who received a scoliosis diagnosis during adolescence, the OR would be 3.15 (95% CI 1.55-6.42). DISCUSSION: This is the first study performed on patients with AN showing a sixfold greater odds of presenting with scoliosis. A cause-effect relationship cannot be determined due to the design.
Adolescent; Anorexia; Idiopathic; Scoliosis; Surgery; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Settore MED/13 - Endocrinologia
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
Settore MED/34 - Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa
2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
zaina et al scoliosis 2017.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 835.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
835.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
10.1007_s00586-017-5181-9.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 574.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
574.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/556058
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact