Objective: The objective of the study was to compare length of stay, blood loss, operative time, and pain of laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison between vaginal (VH) and laparoscopic (LH) hysterectomy among 60 consecutive patients with a uterine volume of 300 mL or less and without uterine prolapse. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: The groups were significantly different for mean operative time (VH: 81 ± 30 minutes; LH: 99 ± 25 minutes; P = .033) and blood loss (LH: 83 ± 57 mL; VH: 178 ± 149 mL; P = .004). Bilateral adnexectomy was performed when preoperatively planned in 73% of cases of the vaginal arm, whereas it was always performed in the laparoscopic arm (P = .045). Postoperative pain on day 0 and the number of days of analgesic request were higher in the vaginal group (P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). LH was associated with a reduced hospital stay (LH: 2.7 ± 0.5 days; VH: 3.2 ± 0.6 days; P < .001).There were no differences between the groups at the follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain compared with vaginal hysterectomy.

Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology / M. Candiani, S. Izzo, A. Bulfoni, J. Riparini, S. Ronzoni, A.M. Marconi. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9378. - 200:4(2009 Apr), pp. 368.e1-368.e7. [10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.016]

Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology

M. Candiani
Primo
;
S. Izzo
Secondo
;
J.G.L. Riparini;A.M. Marconi
Ultimo
2009

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare length of stay, blood loss, operative time, and pain of laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison between vaginal (VH) and laparoscopic (LH) hysterectomy among 60 consecutive patients with a uterine volume of 300 mL or less and without uterine prolapse. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: The groups were significantly different for mean operative time (VH: 81 ± 30 minutes; LH: 99 ± 25 minutes; P = .033) and blood loss (LH: 83 ± 57 mL; VH: 178 ± 149 mL; P = .004). Bilateral adnexectomy was performed when preoperatively planned in 73% of cases of the vaginal arm, whereas it was always performed in the laparoscopic arm (P = .045). Postoperative pain on day 0 and the number of days of analgesic request were higher in the vaginal group (P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). LH was associated with a reduced hospital stay (LH: 2.7 ± 0.5 days; VH: 3.2 ± 0.6 days; P < .001).There were no differences between the groups at the follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain compared with vaginal hysterectomy.
hysterectomy; laparoscopy; prospective; randomized; vaginal
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
apr-2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/70565
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 83
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact