Up to 30% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who are receiving long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy do not exhibit a marked increase in the CD4(+) T cell count, despite achieving complete suppression of the HIV load. These patients are referred to as "immunological nonresponders." When treating immunological nonresponders, the practicing clinician has several questions, including questions about the clinical risk associated with persistent immunodeficiency and about possible approaches to treatment that would provide clinical and immunological benefits. However, tentative answers to these questions require investigations of the mechanisms that underlie the lack of immune recovery, because only the deepest comprehension of the immunological gaps underlying functional defects will allow administration of highly targeted and efficacious treatment strategies. The aim of our review is to provide a thorough assessment of the clinical implications of a lack of increase in the CD4(+) T cell count in immunological nonresponders, to examine the immunological gaps limiting recovery of the CD4(+) T cell count, and to note possible therapeutic avenues, which may offer clinicians guidance regarding how to most efficaciously treat these critical patients.

The absence of CD4+ T cell count recovery despite receipt of virologically suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy : clinical risk, immunological gaps, and therapeutic options / L. Gazzola, C. Tincati, G.M. Bellistrì, A. d’Arminio Monforte, G.C. Marchetti. - In: CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - ISSN 1058-4838. - 48:3(2009 Feb 01), pp. 328-337.

The absence of CD4+ T cell count recovery despite receipt of virologically suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy : clinical risk, immunological gaps, and therapeutic options

L. Gazzola
Primo
;
C. Tincati
Secondo
;
G.M. Bellistrì;A. d’Arminio Monforte
Penultimo
;
G.C. Marchetti
2009

Abstract

Up to 30% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who are receiving long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy do not exhibit a marked increase in the CD4(+) T cell count, despite achieving complete suppression of the HIV load. These patients are referred to as "immunological nonresponders." When treating immunological nonresponders, the practicing clinician has several questions, including questions about the clinical risk associated with persistent immunodeficiency and about possible approaches to treatment that would provide clinical and immunological benefits. However, tentative answers to these questions require investigations of the mechanisms that underlie the lack of immune recovery, because only the deepest comprehension of the immunological gaps underlying functional defects will allow administration of highly targeted and efficacious treatment strategies. The aim of our review is to provide a thorough assessment of the clinical implications of a lack of increase in the CD4(+) T cell count in immunological nonresponders, to examine the immunological gaps limiting recovery of the CD4(+) T cell count, and to note possible therapeutic avenues, which may offer clinicians guidance regarding how to most efficaciously treat these critical patients.
HIV-infected patients; immunodeficiency-virus type-1; hepatitis-C virus; limits immune reconstution; viral supression; thymic function; trials group; bone-marrow; intermittent interleukin-2; clonogenic capability
Settore MED/17 - Malattie Infettive
1-feb-2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gazzola review CID 2009.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 323.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
323.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/64398
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 94
  • Scopus 180
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 168
social impact