Animal Welfare (AW) issues are becoming an increasing concern for food-producing and laboratory animals. Risk Assessment (RA) is usually used to describe and quantify the risk of introduction of infections, toxiinfections or residues coming from veterinary medicines, by importing live animals and their products or to identify options for the control of epidemic or endemic diseases. Recently, RA methods have been sought to be applied to AW as well. However, considering that this is a newly emerging area, for which no general guidelines have been produced, the above mentioned RAs cannot be always directly transferred. The use of a RA approach to evaluate issues related to AW can be useful to better identify and rank welfare risk factors, and to prioritise possible management measures. Possible approaches to AW RA are described and differences and similarities with the classical RA are discussed as well as the problems identified concerning the use of RA methodology for AW. A significant difficulty in AW RA consists in the quantification of the severity and of the probability of exposure of the identified hazards to welfare. Furthermore, data from different expert opinions are not always expressed using the same scale. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has launched RA studies in which AW was considered as endpoint of interest. Examples are briefly discussed

Risk assessment in animal welfare : EFSA approach / C. Müller Graf, D. Candiani, S. Barbieri, O. Ribo, A. Afonso, E. Aiassa, P. Have, S. Correia, F. De Massis, T. Grudnik, J. Serratos. - In: ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING AND EXPERIMENTATION. - ISSN 1344-0411. - 14:Special Issue(2007 Aug), pp. 789-794. ((Intervento presentato al 6. convegno World Congress on Alternatives & Animal Use in the Life Sciences tenutosi a Tokyo (Japan) nel 2007.

Risk assessment in animal welfare : EFSA approach

S. Barbieri;E. Aiassa;
2007

Abstract

Animal Welfare (AW) issues are becoming an increasing concern for food-producing and laboratory animals. Risk Assessment (RA) is usually used to describe and quantify the risk of introduction of infections, toxiinfections or residues coming from veterinary medicines, by importing live animals and their products or to identify options for the control of epidemic or endemic diseases. Recently, RA methods have been sought to be applied to AW as well. However, considering that this is a newly emerging area, for which no general guidelines have been produced, the above mentioned RAs cannot be always directly transferred. The use of a RA approach to evaluate issues related to AW can be useful to better identify and rank welfare risk factors, and to prioritise possible management measures. Possible approaches to AW RA are described and differences and similarities with the classical RA are discussed as well as the problems identified concerning the use of RA methodology for AW. A significant difficulty in AW RA consists in the quantification of the severity and of the probability of exposure of the identified hazards to welfare. Furthermore, data from different expert opinions are not always expressed using the same scale. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has launched RA studies in which AW was considered as endpoint of interest. Examples are briefly discussed
animal welfare ; risk assessment ; hazard ; EFSA
ago-2007
http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jsaae/zasshi/WC6_PC/paper789.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/64280
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact