Objective Nickel is the most common cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Because nickel restriction is commonly imposed on many patients with the only earlobe ACD to nickel hypersensitivity, the aim of this study was to identify the role of occasional and extended oral nickel exposure in these patients. Design This is a case-control study Subjects Thirty-four outpatients, previously diagnosed as monosensitized to nickel, suffering from earlobe dermatitis were enrolled; 11 of them showed active dermatitis. The control group consisted of six healthy (non-nickel-sensitive) subjects. Interventions High oral nickel challenge (20 mg) and protracted oral challenge (1 mg once a day). Observation period: 6 weeks. Results Clinical earlobe lesions were not affected by a high oral nickel intake nor by a protracted oral challenge. Conclusions Dietary nickel restriction seems to be useless in patients with earlobe ACD due to nickel hypersensitivity.

Nickel earlobe dermatitis and clinical non-relevance of the oral exposure / F. Di Berardino, D. Alpini, A. Cesarani. - In: JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY. - ISSN 0926-9959. - 22:10(2008), pp. 1215-1217. [10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02779.x]

Nickel earlobe dermatitis and clinical non-relevance of the oral exposure

F. Di Berardino
Primo
;
A. Cesarani
Ultimo
2008

Abstract

Objective Nickel is the most common cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Because nickel restriction is commonly imposed on many patients with the only earlobe ACD to nickel hypersensitivity, the aim of this study was to identify the role of occasional and extended oral nickel exposure in these patients. Design This is a case-control study Subjects Thirty-four outpatients, previously diagnosed as monosensitized to nickel, suffering from earlobe dermatitis were enrolled; 11 of them showed active dermatitis. The control group consisted of six healthy (non-nickel-sensitive) subjects. Interventions High oral nickel challenge (20 mg) and protracted oral challenge (1 mg once a day). Observation period: 6 weeks. Results Clinical earlobe lesions were not affected by a high oral nickel intake nor by a protracted oral challenge. Conclusions Dietary nickel restriction seems to be useless in patients with earlobe ACD due to nickel hypersensitivity.
ACD; earlobe dermatitis; nickel oral intake; nickel
Settore MED/32 - Audiologia
2008
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
nichel.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 61.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
61.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/46036
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact