A comparative study was performed to evaluate differences in milk yield between an automatic milking system (AMS) and a conventional herringbone milking parlor system. Two herds of Italian-Friesian cows were reared in the same barn, located in the Po Valley in northern Italy. Twenty-five primiparous cows and 10 multiparous cows were milked with an AMS, while at the same time 29 primiparous and 9 multiparous were milked twice daily in a milking parlor on the other side of the barn. A selection gate allowed cows to access the AMS only if the interval from last milking was >5 h. Multiparous cows in the AMS yielded more milk than multiparous cows in the milking parlor (34.2 ± 0.7 vs. 29.4 > 0.6 kg/d). There was no difference in milk yield between primiparous cows in the AMS and in the milking parlor (28.9 > 0.4 vs. 28.8 > 0.3 kg/d). Milking frequency in the AMS was significantly higher in primiparous (2.8 > 0.03) than in multiparous cows (2.5 > 0.04). The hot season negatively affected milk yield; the milk yield reduction was higher for cows milked with the AMS (-4.5 > 0.6 kg/d) than in the milking parlor (-3.0 > 0.8 kg/d). In the AMS, milking frequency decreased during the hot season in primiparous cows (-0.3 > 0.1). We concluded that a positive AMS effect on milk yield is possible, but that steps must be taken to alleviate the discomfort involved with attracting cows to the AMS.

Effect of Automatic Milking Systems on Milk Yield in a Hot Environment / M. Speroni, G. Pirlo, S. Lolli. - In: JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE. - ISSN 0022-0302. - 89:12(2006), pp. 4687-4693. [10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72519-X ]

Effect of Automatic Milking Systems on Milk Yield in a Hot Environment

S. Lolli
Ultimo
2006

Abstract

A comparative study was performed to evaluate differences in milk yield between an automatic milking system (AMS) and a conventional herringbone milking parlor system. Two herds of Italian-Friesian cows were reared in the same barn, located in the Po Valley in northern Italy. Twenty-five primiparous cows and 10 multiparous cows were milked with an AMS, while at the same time 29 primiparous and 9 multiparous were milked twice daily in a milking parlor on the other side of the barn. A selection gate allowed cows to access the AMS only if the interval from last milking was >5 h. Multiparous cows in the AMS yielded more milk than multiparous cows in the milking parlor (34.2 ± 0.7 vs. 29.4 > 0.6 kg/d). There was no difference in milk yield between primiparous cows in the AMS and in the milking parlor (28.9 > 0.4 vs. 28.8 > 0.3 kg/d). Milking frequency in the AMS was significantly higher in primiparous (2.8 > 0.03) than in multiparous cows (2.5 > 0.04). The hot season negatively affected milk yield; the milk yield reduction was higher for cows milked with the AMS (-4.5 > 0.6 kg/d) than in the milking parlor (-3.0 > 0.8 kg/d). In the AMS, milking frequency decreased during the hot season in primiparous cows (-0.3 > 0.1). We concluded that a positive AMS effect on milk yield is possible, but that steps must be taken to alleviate the discomfort involved with attracting cows to the AMS.
Automatic milking; Dairy cow; Milk yield; Milking frequency
Settore AGR/20 - Zoocolture
2006
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/31879
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact