Objective: Mortality after many procedures is lower in centers where more procedures are done. It is controversial whether this is true for intensive care units, too. We examined the relationship between the volume of activity of intensive care units (ICUs) and mortality by a measure of risk-adjusted volume of activity specific for ICUs. Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. Setting: Eighty-nine ICUs in 12 European countries. Patients: During a 4-month study period, 12,615 patients were enrolled. Interventions: Demographic and clinical statistics, severity at admission and a score of nursing complexity and workload were collected. Results: Total volume of activity was defined as the number of patients admitted per bed per year, high-risk volume as the number of high-risk patients admitted per bed per year (selected combining of length of stay and severity of illness). A multi-step risk-adjustment process was planned. ICU volume corresponding both to overall [odds ratio (OR) 0.966] and 3,838 high-risk (OR 0.830) patients was negatively correlated with mortality. Relative mortality decreased by 3.4 and 17.0% for every five extra patients treated per bed per year in overall volume and high-risk volume, respectively. A direct relationship was found between mortality and the ICU occupancy rate (OR 1.324 and 1.351, respectively). Conclusions: Intensive care patients, whatever their level of risk, are best treated where more high-risk patients are treated. Moreover, the higher the ICU occupancy rate, the higher is the mortality.

Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units : association with mortality / G. Iapichino, L. Gattinoni, D. Radrizzani, B. Simini, G. Bertolini, L. Ferla, G. Mistraletti, F. Porta, D.R. Miranda. - In: INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0342-4642. - 30:2(2004 Feb), pp. 290-297. [10.1007/s00134-003-2113-4]

Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units : association with mortality

G. Iapichino;L. Gattinoni;G. Mistraletti;
2004

Abstract

Objective: Mortality after many procedures is lower in centers where more procedures are done. It is controversial whether this is true for intensive care units, too. We examined the relationship between the volume of activity of intensive care units (ICUs) and mortality by a measure of risk-adjusted volume of activity specific for ICUs. Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. Setting: Eighty-nine ICUs in 12 European countries. Patients: During a 4-month study period, 12,615 patients were enrolled. Interventions: Demographic and clinical statistics, severity at admission and a score of nursing complexity and workload were collected. Results: Total volume of activity was defined as the number of patients admitted per bed per year, high-risk volume as the number of high-risk patients admitted per bed per year (selected combining of length of stay and severity of illness). A multi-step risk-adjustment process was planned. ICU volume corresponding both to overall [odds ratio (OR) 0.966] and 3,838 high-risk (OR 0.830) patients was negatively correlated with mortality. Relative mortality decreased by 3.4 and 17.0% for every five extra patients treated per bed per year in overall volume and high-risk volume, respectively. A direct relationship was found between mortality and the ICU occupancy rate (OR 1.324 and 1.351, respectively). Conclusions: Intensive care patients, whatever their level of risk, are best treated where more high-risk patients are treated. Moreover, the higher the ICU occupancy rate, the higher is the mortality.
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
feb-2004
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/24313
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 25
  • Scopus 97
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 72
social impact