The growing use of brain imaging technology and the developing of cognitive neuroscience pose unaccustomed challenges to legal systems. Until now, the fields of Law much affected are the civil and criminal law and procedure, but the constitutional dimension of “neurolaw” cannot be easily underestimated. As the capacity to investigate and to trace brain mechanisms and functional neural activities increases, it becomes urgent the recognition and definition of the unalienable rights and fundamental values in respect of this new technoscientific power, that must be protected and safeguard at “constitutional level” of norms such as: human dignity, personal identity, authenticity and the pursuit of individual “happiness”. As the same as for the law regulating research and experimentation on human genome adopted in the past years, one may also argue if the above mentioned fundamental principles of “neurolaw” must be fixed and disciplined also at European and International level.

In quest of constitutional principles of "neurolaw" / F.G. Pizzetti. - In: MEDICINA NEI SECOLI. - ISSN 0394-9001. - 23:3(2011), pp. 963-990.

In quest of constitutional principles of "neurolaw"

F.G. Pizzetti
Primo
2011

Abstract

The growing use of brain imaging technology and the developing of cognitive neuroscience pose unaccustomed challenges to legal systems. Until now, the fields of Law much affected are the civil and criminal law and procedure, but the constitutional dimension of “neurolaw” cannot be easily underestimated. As the capacity to investigate and to trace brain mechanisms and functional neural activities increases, it becomes urgent the recognition and definition of the unalienable rights and fundamental values in respect of this new technoscientific power, that must be protected and safeguard at “constitutional level” of norms such as: human dignity, personal identity, authenticity and the pursuit of individual “happiness”. As the same as for the law regulating research and experimentation on human genome adopted in the past years, one may also argue if the above mentioned fundamental principles of “neurolaw” must be fixed and disciplined also at European and International level.
Cognitive Neuroscience ; Functional Magnetic Resounance Imaging and other neurotechnologies ; Bioethics ; Neurolaw ; Human rights ; Constitutional principles ; International and European protection of fundamental rights
Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionale
Settore IUS/21 - Diritto Pubblico Comparato
Settore IUS/09 - Istituzioni di Diritto Pubblico
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto
2011
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MED_23_3_13_Pizzetti.pdf

accesso solo dalla rete interna

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 694.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
694.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/174300
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact