The relation between contraceptive methods and risk of pelvic endometriosis has been analyzed in a case-control study. Cases were 376 women with laparoscopically or laparotomically confirmed pelvic endometriosis admitted to a network of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics in Lombardy, Northern Italy. Controls were 522 women admitted for acute non-gynecological and non-obstetrics conditions to the same hospitals where cases had been identified. A total 153 women (40.3%) out of the 377 cases and 154 (29.7%) out of the 522 controls reported ever oral contraceptive (OC) use: the corresponding relative risk (RR) was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.2-2.2). The risk was restricted to ex-OC users (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.4), the estimated RR for current users being 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.9). No clear relation emerged with duration, recency and latency of OC use and risk of endometriosis. In comparison with never IUD users, the risk for ever users was 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-2.8), and no clear relation emerged with duration of use. Likewise, no association was observed between barrier method of contraception and risk of endometriosis (RR ever vs never users 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.4). The role of selection and other biases should be considered in the interpretation of epidemiological data on the role of OC on the risk of endometriosis.

Contraceptive methods and risk of pelvic endometriosis / F. Parazzini, M. Ferraroni, L. Bocciolone, L. Tozzi, S. Rubessa, C. La Vecchia. - In: CONTRACEPTION. - ISSN 0010-7824. - 49:1(1994 Jan), pp. 47-55.

Contraceptive methods and risk of pelvic endometriosis

F. Parazzini
Primo
;
M. Ferraroni
Secondo
;
C. La Vecchia
Ultimo
1994

Abstract

The relation between contraceptive methods and risk of pelvic endometriosis has been analyzed in a case-control study. Cases were 376 women with laparoscopically or laparotomically confirmed pelvic endometriosis admitted to a network of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics in Lombardy, Northern Italy. Controls were 522 women admitted for acute non-gynecological and non-obstetrics conditions to the same hospitals where cases had been identified. A total 153 women (40.3%) out of the 377 cases and 154 (29.7%) out of the 522 controls reported ever oral contraceptive (OC) use: the corresponding relative risk (RR) was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.2-2.2). The risk was restricted to ex-OC users (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.4), the estimated RR for current users being 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.9). No clear relation emerged with duration, recency and latency of OC use and risk of endometriosis. In comparison with never IUD users, the risk for ever users was 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-2.8), and no clear relation emerged with duration of use. Likewise, no association was observed between barrier method of contraception and risk of endometriosis (RR ever vs never users 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.4). The role of selection and other biases should be considered in the interpretation of epidemiological data on the role of OC on the risk of endometriosis.
Measurement ; Iud ; Barrier Methods ; Humans ; Endometrial Effects ; Contraceptives, Oral ; Physiology ; Oral Contraceptives ; Endometriosis ; Contraceptive Methods ; Europe ; Developed Countries ; Italy ; Southern Europe ; Technical Report ; Genitalia, Female ; Adult ; Family Planning ; Uterus ; Endometrium ; Genitalia ; Studies ; Case Control Studies ; Error Sources ; Contraception ; Mediterranean Countries ; Intrauterine Devices ; Risk Factors ; Urogenital System ; Case-Control Studies ; Bias ; Female ; Biology
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
gen-1994
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/168023
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact