Objective: To evaluate stent-induced artifacts by 64-row multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: We studied 26 stented patients with MDCT before conventional coronary angiography (CCA). The CT values were measured. Stents were classified as occluded, with significant stenosis, with nonsignificant stenosis, or patent. For the patent stents, mean in-stent and out-stent CT values were compared; stents 3 mm or smaller were compared with stents larger than 3 mm. Multidetector CT was compared with CCA. Results: We analyzed 42 stents. At CCA, 34 stents were patent, 5 were nonsignificantly stenosed, 1 was significantly stenosed, and 2 were occluded. At MDCT, 33 of 34 patent stents, 2 occluded stents, and 1 stent with significant stenosis were correctly diagnosed; nonsignificant stenoses were undetected, 1 patent stent was misdiagnosed as occluded (kappa = 0.727). The out-stent CT value was lower than in-stent CT value both in stents 3 mm or smaller (P = 0.001) and stents larger than 3 mm (P < 0.001). The in-stent CT value of stents 3 mm or smaller was higher (P = 0.011) than that of stents larger than 3 mm. Conclusions: Metal artifacts cause overlooking of nonsignificant stenosis.

In vivo assessment of coronary stents with 64-row multidetector computed tomography : Analysis of metal artifacts / G.D.E. Papini, F. Casolo, G. Di Leo, S. Briganti, C. Fantoni, M. Medda, L. Inglese, L. De Ambroggi, F. Sardanelli. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 0363-8715. - 34:6(2010), pp. 921-926. [10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181ddbbc0]

In vivo assessment of coronary stents with 64-row multidetector computed tomography : Analysis of metal artifacts

L. De Ambroggi
Penultimo
;
F. Sardanelli
Ultimo
2010

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate stent-induced artifacts by 64-row multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: We studied 26 stented patients with MDCT before conventional coronary angiography (CCA). The CT values were measured. Stents were classified as occluded, with significant stenosis, with nonsignificant stenosis, or patent. For the patent stents, mean in-stent and out-stent CT values were compared; stents 3 mm or smaller were compared with stents larger than 3 mm. Multidetector CT was compared with CCA. Results: We analyzed 42 stents. At CCA, 34 stents were patent, 5 were nonsignificantly stenosed, 1 was significantly stenosed, and 2 were occluded. At MDCT, 33 of 34 patent stents, 2 occluded stents, and 1 stent with significant stenosis were correctly diagnosed; nonsignificant stenoses were undetected, 1 patent stent was misdiagnosed as occluded (kappa = 0.727). The out-stent CT value was lower than in-stent CT value both in stents 3 mm or smaller (P = 0.001) and stents larger than 3 mm (P < 0.001). The in-stent CT value of stents 3 mm or smaller was higher (P = 0.011) than that of stents larger than 3 mm. Conclusions: Metal artifacts cause overlooking of nonsignificant stenosis.
64-row computed tomography; coronary angiography; coronary stent; metal artifacts
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
2010
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/156160
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact