Background: A neuroprotective effect of lithium in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been recently reported. We performed a multicenter trial with lithium carbonate to assess its tolerability, safety, and efficacy in patients with ALS, comparing 2 different target blood levels (0.4–0.8 mEq/L, therapeutic group [TG], vs 0.2–0.4 mEq/L, subtherapeutic group [STG]). Methods: The study was a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial, conducted from May 2008 to November 2009 in 21 Italian ALS centers. The trial was registered with the public database of the Italian Agency for Drugs (http://oss-sper-clin.agenziafarmaco.it/) (EudraCT number 2008–001094-15). Results: As of October 2009, a total of 171 patients had been enrolled, 87 randomized to the TG and 84 to the STG. The interim data analysis, performed per protocol, showed that 117 patients (68.4%) discontinued the study because of death/tracheotomy/severe disability, adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs (SAEs), or lack of efficacy. The Data Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial on November 2, 2009. Conclusions: Lithium was not well-tolerated in this cohort of patients with ALS, even at subtherapeutic doses. The 2 doses were equivalent in terms of survival/severe disability and functional data. The relatively high frequency of AEs/SAEs and the reduced tolerability of lithium raised serious doubts about its safety in ALS. Classification of evidence: The study provides Class II evidence that therapeutic (0.4–0.8 mEq/L) vs subtherapeutic (0.2–0.4 mEq/L) lithium carbonate did not differ in the primary outcome of efficacy (survival/loss of autonomy) in ALS. Both target levels led to dropouts in more than 30% of participants due to patient-perceived lack of efficacy and AEs.

Lithium carbonate in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis : lack of efficacy in a dose finding trial / A. Chiò, G. Borghero, A. Calvo, M. Capasso, C. Caponnetto, M. Corbo, F. Giannini, G. Logroscino, J. Mandrioli, N. Marcello, L. Mazzini, C. Moglia, M.R. Monsurrò, G. Mora, F. Patti, M. Perini, V. Pietrini, F. Pisano, E. Pupillo, M. Sabatelli, F. Salvi, V. Silani, I.L. Simone, G. Sorarù, M.R. Tola, P. Volanti, E Beghi for the LITIAS Study Group. - In: NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0028-3878. - 75:7(2010), pp. 619-625.

Lithium carbonate in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis : lack of efficacy in a dose finding trial

V. Silani;
2010

Abstract

Background: A neuroprotective effect of lithium in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been recently reported. We performed a multicenter trial with lithium carbonate to assess its tolerability, safety, and efficacy in patients with ALS, comparing 2 different target blood levels (0.4–0.8 mEq/L, therapeutic group [TG], vs 0.2–0.4 mEq/L, subtherapeutic group [STG]). Methods: The study was a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial, conducted from May 2008 to November 2009 in 21 Italian ALS centers. The trial was registered with the public database of the Italian Agency for Drugs (http://oss-sper-clin.agenziafarmaco.it/) (EudraCT number 2008–001094-15). Results: As of October 2009, a total of 171 patients had been enrolled, 87 randomized to the TG and 84 to the STG. The interim data analysis, performed per protocol, showed that 117 patients (68.4%) discontinued the study because of death/tracheotomy/severe disability, adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs (SAEs), or lack of efficacy. The Data Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial on November 2, 2009. Conclusions: Lithium was not well-tolerated in this cohort of patients with ALS, even at subtherapeutic doses. The 2 doses were equivalent in terms of survival/severe disability and functional data. The relatively high frequency of AEs/SAEs and the reduced tolerability of lithium raised serious doubts about its safety in ALS. Classification of evidence: The study provides Class II evidence that therapeutic (0.4–0.8 mEq/L) vs subtherapeutic (0.2–0.4 mEq/L) lithium carbonate did not differ in the primary outcome of efficacy (survival/loss of autonomy) in ALS. Both target levels led to dropouts in more than 30% of participants due to patient-perceived lack of efficacy and AEs.
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
Settore MAT/08 - Analisi Numerica
2010
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/153614
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 21
  • Scopus 86
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 80
social impact