A critical review of Kahana and Hiss' study on identification from bone trabecular pattern and a test of their method conducted on the humerus are presented. Bone trabecular pattern was studied through the generation of a numerical file representing the gray scale. Using the correlation coefficient, several pairwise comparisons between numerical files were performed. The test gave nearly 30% of incorrect exclusions (the method did not recognize couples of radiographs belonging to the same subject) and 50% of misidentifications (the method recognized couples of radiographs belonging to different subjects, as belonging to the same subject); therefore, this research shows that at the present time, it is not possible to safely quantify identification through bone density patterns, of the proximal humerus taken from thoracic X-rays. Thus, an "easy"-but dangerous-use of trabecular density patterns on this specific type of radiogram as an identification method should be currently avoided.

Identification from chest x-rays: reliability of bone density patterns of the humerus / R. Ciaffi, D. De Angelis, P.F. Gherardini, G. Arcudi, R. Nessi, G.P. Cornalba, M. Grandi, C. Cattaneo. - In: JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES. - ISSN 0022-1198. - 55:2(2010 Feb), pp. 478-481. [10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01297.x]

Identification from chest x-rays: reliability of bone density patterns of the humerus

D. De Angelis
Secondo
;
M. Grandi
Penultimo
;
C. Cattaneo
Ultimo
2010

Abstract

A critical review of Kahana and Hiss' study on identification from bone trabecular pattern and a test of their method conducted on the humerus are presented. Bone trabecular pattern was studied through the generation of a numerical file representing the gray scale. Using the correlation coefficient, several pairwise comparisons between numerical files were performed. The test gave nearly 30% of incorrect exclusions (the method did not recognize couples of radiographs belonging to the same subject) and 50% of misidentifications (the method recognized couples of radiographs belonging to different subjects, as belonging to the same subject); therefore, this research shows that at the present time, it is not possible to safely quantify identification through bone density patterns, of the proximal humerus taken from thoracic X-rays. Thus, an "easy"-but dangerous-use of trabecular density patterns on this specific type of radiogram as an identification method should be currently avoided.
Forensic anthropology; Forensic radiology; Forensic science; Human identification; Humerus; Quantification; Thoracic radiograph; Trabecular bone pattern
Settore MED/43 - Medicina Legale
feb-2010
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123279994/PDFSTART
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/142556
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact